Tabloid consciousness or realism?
On the one dimensional man, escapism, and the state
The nation’s completely failed minds, and illiteracies
At this moment, America is in an advanced collapse trajectory. What’s in a worse state of collapse is up for debate, whether the state, or the nation?
In order for the people to be swept up by such a one dimensional tabloid consciousness, both on the anarchic left, and the hard pro policing right, there is absolutely no citations to reality. People who are swept up either way, are of such a low level of development, that it’s hard to grasp from the standpoint of reason.
When I put together a few of the hyper realistic facts, in a somewhat organized way, my own mind formed a two narratives.
The first narrative was that the rulers, in which the productive forces have grown to a globalized scale, are infighting, and competing with the limits of the old world order. This is because those elites now live outside of civilization’s social contracts and its bounds, and must erode those boundaries entirely.
The second narrative, is that the techno feudal capacity of oligopolies, ie globe spanning corporate power of Big Tech and Big Pharma, is that they operate entirely from the shadows. Sharing non-factual memes of either anti-law or pro-policing, are probably the biggest waste of time I can imagine. It signifies not only, the end of the actual world, but the end of ‘knowing’ that we are now in a matrix of manufactured lies.
You cannot engage with discussion with people who are living in a dystopian parallel reality where nothing is real, and they believe the news that has had a one hundred percent track record of lying in the past.
The very basis of discussion is that there can be no basis. Talking to leftists and rightists, ie the collective West, in the collapse of America is like talking to a creature from Alice in Wonderland, with far less literary style.
A debate between Beavis and Butt-Head
Butt-Head: ‘You’re the old fool, I’m only three years older than you. So, you’re older than me. You’re almost a hundred.’
Beavis: ‘You’re the one who’s almost a hundred, you’ve already surpassed it, talking to spirits, touching invisible chairs… You’ve failed everything, and I’ve done everything wonderfully.’
Butt-Head: ‘No, I’ve done everything wonderfully, and you’ve failed everything. Besides, you’re a lecherous alley cat.’
Beavis: ‘I’m not a cat, I don’t even know who Stormy Daniels is, my lawyers will tear her apart.’
Butt-Head: ‘You’ll ruin NATO.’
Beavis: ‘What’s NATO?’
Butt-Head: ‘Why did you even attack the Capitol?’
Beavis: ‘What’s the Capitol? But it doesn’t matter, you’re about to die, and we’ll make America great again.’
Butt-Head: ‘I’ve already made it great, because I’ve let in a lot of different people, and you want to ruin everything. Look how many migrants have climbed over your wall now? They shine in all the colours of the rainbow, I watch them for hours.’
Beavis: ‘And you were scared of a fake rabbit. I’ll build my wall again and entomb all the migrants in it.’
Butt-Head: ‘I won’t let you, I’ll send my friend — superhero Zelensky — after you. He has special tight pants that allow him to fly.’
Beavis: ‘He’s a crook, he comes and robs us. I’ll burn him alive with my superpowers.’
Butt-Head: ‘I’ll burn you now or turn you to ice because you’re a tomcat in heat.’
Beavis: ‘I don’t even know who Stormy Daniels is…’
Consider the propositional logic of Alice in Wonderland.
For example, In Alice in Wonderland, Alice says, "If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary-wise; what it is it wouldn't be, and what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?"
Consider the following follow up analysis by
.
If you consider the most important points to what the situation has evolved to, it is quite simple.
The assassin who killed the UnitedHealthcare CEO will almost certainly be caught quickly due to the advanced technological surveillance state, especially given the target was a wealthy and powerful individual. The official story of how Luigi Mangione was identified may be parallel construction to hide the true methods used.
The author argues it may force elites to factor in public blowback and serve as a check on unlimited greed and exploitation. He notes the upper middle class, not the lower classes, are the biggest threat to elites.
Let’s apply some propositional logic to this.
Let’s begin by seeing the complete schizo making of the elite to populist relationship.
The problem of elite power, and populism, is that both left and right had a massive populist response. Neither populist response to a fake situation regarding the elite, matched any kind of sane value regarding their relationships.
Even if the events as they were alleged in mainstream narratives did take place in the real world, the values of truth, and justice, in which the elite subject would be Big Tech, Big Pharma, globe spanning corrupt corporate power, the values would become their opposites. The populism responses of memes or policing, neither touch on the actual propositional subjects of the elite, or their relationships.
For example, what does memes have to do with the actual problems? What does policing have to do with the actual problems? Both are logical disconnectives, negations, or just nonsense.
By destroying the relationship of left, or right, to their value forms, then they often merge and cease to be of any value. Furthermore they can both be each other, because the value form of what that means, doesn’t actually mean anything.
The more Orwellian authoritarianism replaces the old world order with new forms, it creates conditions for its own negation through a crisis point.
What we envision as society often comes from our shared Western history of living in civil society in the modern period. When certain forms subordinate other values forms, collapsing their old meanings, for new meanings, there is a completely new capture of systems.
In systems theory, it means that both the ideas of the state, and liberty, are over. They’re being captured by new forms. Whether we call it techno feudalism, fascism, or whatever.
Can you imagine a world where the ‘left’ is cheering on elite on elite assassinations, in which the elite can be non-elites in relation to elites without any value forms at all.
So that as violence rises between elites and elites, in which an elite can also be a non elite without any value form of what elites or non elites means, then violence occurs for reasons other than reasons.
Nothing exists about it, in which nothing logically can connect about it.
The negation of elitism, by being an elite with unlimited global power, somehow creates the conditions of extreme weakness. For example, if you become powerful, you could die or be assasinated.
To synthesize, in propositional logic, we can see a permanent and terminal security crisis as the old world dies, and a new one comes online.
As I posited earlier, both forms of state, and liberties under a state, are being captured and transformed by a larger subordination of productive forces. Whether this takes the government form of a techno feudalism is hard to say.
However, without a state, or any kind of civil liberty in the old senses of the words, then we find ourselves in a severe security paradox. The circular logic trap, which I would argue is being created by a matrix of stupidity, means that it will necessitate more of itself until people are acclimated.
What does “more of itself” mean? I would guess narrative control.